Latest Tags Designers Websites My boards Image search About

Search the collection/Search↵

ui-design.studio

Search the collection

Latest
Tags
Designers
Websites
My boards
Image search
About

Loading shot…

A curated collection of interface design. Every shot belongs to its designer and links straight back to the original work.

Want your work removed or credited differently? See the takedown policy.

Explore

Latest
Tags
Designers
About
Changelog

Follow

RSS
@uidesign_studio

Operated by New Horizon Code Pty Ltd, trading as Syrup · ABN 61 634 659 804

Terms Privacy Copyright

ui-design.studio

Latest Tags Designers Websites My boards Image search About

Search the collection/Search↵

ui-design.studio

Search the collection

Latest
Tags
Designers
Websites
My boards
Image search
About

ui-design.studio

A curated collection of interface design. Every shot belongs to its designer and links straight back to the original work.

Want your work removed or credited differently? See the takedown policy.

Explore

Latest
Tags
Designers
About
Changelog

Follow

RSS
@uidesign_studio

Operated by New Horizon Code Pty Ltd, trading as Syrup · ABN 61 634 659 804

Terms Privacy Copyright

Namya @ Supafast (@namyakhann) · ui-design.studio

All shots

00:00

−00:00

Despite the Framer hype, we still get tons of requests for custom Next.js + Tailwind sites. Because most founders and their teams don't want to learn another tool. They want to own their code, not rent it. Just shipped a landing page in Next.js for a SaaS. Their reasoning: - Full control over performance optimization - No vendor lock-in - Developers can maintain it without learning Framer - Custom functionality without workarounds - Better SEO control Sure, Framer is faster to build. But he no-code movement sold everyone on "anyone can build websites now" and forgot that someone still needs to maintain them. What's your take: Custom code for control or no-code for speed?